Reparations
to African-Canadians
In 2017 a three-member Expert Panel filed a report
to the United Nations Human Rights Council on people of African descent in
Canada. https://ansa.novascotia.ca/sites/default/files/files/report-of-the-working-group-of-experts-on-people-of-african-descent-on-its-mission-to-canada.pdf This report discussed contemporary
problems such as the criminal justice system, health, education, and housing as
they affect African-Canadians. It also discussed Canada’s history of racism.
The panel’s first recommendation was that the
Government of Canada should “issue an apology and consider providing
reparations to African Canadians for enslavement and historical injustices.” On
June 2, 2020 reporters asked Prime Minister JustinTrudeau whether he would act
on this recommendation. He evaded the question.https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-trudeau-wont-say-whether-canada-will-apologize-for-history-of-slavery/
Slavery
was legal in Canada until 1834, when Britain abolished slavery in all its
territories. Canada did not have a
slave-based plantation economy, but many people owned slaves, including
government and military officials; Loyalists; bishops, priests and nuns; and tradesmen such as hotel keepers. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/black-enslavement
Nevertheless, some might argue that Canada should
not pay reparations to all African-Canadians. Most African-Canadians are not
descended from people enslaved in Canada.
Some are descended from people who escaped slavery in the US by coming
to Canada. Many are, or are descended from, immigrants to Canada from the Caribbean,
Africa, and elsewhere. Most of these people arrived after 1962, when Canada
removed its racist restrictions on immigration. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/immigration-policy
But even if they are not descended from people
enslaved in Canada, most African-Canadians have suffered—and many still do suffer--from
the “historical injustices” the Expert Panel mentions. Our Prime Minister could
apologize both for slavery and for historic and contemporary injustices endured
by African-Canadians.
Financial reparations are more difficult than
apology. Many people think that financial reparation means giving every
individual in a certain group a certain amount of money. Japanese-Canadians who
were interned during World War II received an apology from Prime Minister Brian
Mulroney in 1988, along with a payment of $21,000 to each living survivor. https://humanrights.ca/story/japanese-canadian-internment-and-the-struggle-for-redress
The Japanese-Canadian redress was relatively easy to
implement because the internment had been relatively recent, some victims were
still alive, and the number was relatively small. By contrast, enslavement
ended 186 years ago: no victims are still alive and many of the descendants of
enslaved individuals might not be identifiable now.
On the other hand, racial discrimination was not formally
prohibited uniformly in Canada until the Canadian Bill of Rights was proclaimed
in 1960. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-12.3/FullText.html
.
Reparations for discrimination before and after 1960
need not take the form of financial payment to every individual African-Canadian.
But reparations for specific groups of victims of past and present harms are a
viable option.
For example, the Expert Panel notes the high rate at
which children are removed from African-Canadian families. Reparations might be
paid to members of this group, just as it’s been paid to Indigenous victims of
the “sixties scoop,” when Indigenous children were removed from their original
families and adopted by Euro-Canadians. https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/sixties-scoop-survivors-decade-long-journey-for-justice-culminates-in-historic-pan-canadian-agreement-649748633.html
The federal and provincial governments could also
establish funds for reparations to African-Canadian victims of ongoing
maltreatment in prisons and jails. Recognition of the systemic nature of this
maltreatment would mean that individuals would not have to prove their
particular case for reparation in each instance.
And federal and provincial governments could
establish funds for African-Canadian communities affected by environmental racism.
The Expert Panel noted that “environmentally hazardous activities are
disproportionately situated near neighbourhoods where many people of African
descent live.”
Even municipal leaders could apologize for the
actions of their predecessors.
The neighbourhood of Westdale in Hamilton, Ontario was
built in the 1920s under a “protective covenant.” As historian John C. Weaver
explains in his 1982 book, Hamilton: An
Illustrated History, this covenant forbade sales to members of many
different ethnic, religious and racial groups, among which “Negroes,” was the
first group listed. The courts did not prohibit this segregation until after
WWII.
Discrimination in housing means that
African-Canadians of the early 20th century had less opportunity to
acquire wealth than white Canadians. This disparity in wealth may well carry
down through generations. Contemporary African-Canadians as a group may well inherit
less from their immediate ancestors than Euro-Canadians.
If the municipal government at the time permitted
this institutionalized racism in Hamilton, then its Mayor could apologize for
it now. So could any existing private organization such as banks, mortgage companies,
or real estate agencies that were involved in upholding racially-biased protective
covenants during the first half of last century. They might consider what
reparations they could pay; for example, by donating to scholarship funds for local
African-Canadian students.
Not only all levels of government, but also all public
and private institutions should examine their consciences and their pasts. Faith
communities, school boards, universities, health services, and private
businesses may all be implicated in systemic racism against African-Canadians. All
could consider formal apologies and collective financial reparations.
No comments:
Post a Comment