70 Years of International
Human Rights
December 10, 2018 is
the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, proclaimed in
1948 by the United Nations General Assembly. Since then an enormous body of international
human rights laws has been developed.
Some people think that
human rights should not be universal.
Some critics believe
that human rights are an example of Western cultural imperialism. They claim
that non-Western countries did not participate in drafting the Universal
Declaration. Yet non-Western countries have been involved since the earliest
stages in drawing up human rights documents. This is so even if, like Western
countries, they are quite hypocritical when it comes to applying the laws they
agree to.
Other critics argue
that human rights promote selfish individualism. Instead of caring for the
family or community, people only care for their own rights. But in countries
like Canada where human rights are by and large respected, it’s only because
citizens do have a sense of community and care for each other. Housing
advocates, food bank workers, and millions of volunteers help make human rights
“work” on the ground.
Yet other commentators
claim that as China and other non-democratic countries become more powerful,
human rights will be less important internationally. It is true that such
countries will work to undermine many human rights, at home and at the UN. But
that makes human rights more relevant, not less. We all need protection against
abusive governments.
Human rights are still
relevant, and new rights are evolving.
One recent sign of
progress is in LGBT rights. This topic is difficult to discuss internationally,
because some African and Middle Eastern countries are still very homophobic, as
are some religious groups, in the Western world and elsewhere. We don’t yet
have an international declaration on LGBT rights, but the UN is paying more
attention to them.
In the last twenty
years, much attention has been paid to “collective” human rights. These are rights
than belong to groups of people and that one individual can’t exercise if
others can’t also exercise them.
Indigenous rights are collective
rights. Indigenous peoples cannot live together as collectivities if their ways
of life, languages, religions, cultures, and land bases are threatened. In 2007
the UN passed UNDRIP, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples. Canada voted against the Declaration, but later reversed its position.
By 2016 the government declared its full support for UNDRIP.
A collective right that
affects everyone everywhere is the right to a clean and healthy environment. This
includes the right to protection against climate changes that undermine our
livelihoods and well-being.
Another collective
right is the right to peace. Viewed narrowly, this is the right not to live in
a state of war. In 2018, many people still live in war-torn countries, especially
in the Middle East and Africa. Others, as in Ukraine, live in fear of war. And
we all live in fear of nuclear war.
Both climate change and
war create huge refugee populations. By 2050, it’s thought, there will be 200
million “climate refugees” fleeing rising sea levels. Add to that the refugees who
are fleeing large-scale crime, like the Central American migrant caravan currently
trying to get into the US.
The UN recently
agreed on a Global Compact for Migration, setting out voluntary principles
meant to save lives and ensure successful migrant integration into new
countries without unduly burdening social infrastructure such as health care. But
the real problem is to ensure people don’t have to leave home at all.
One way to ensure more
people stay at home is by developing their economies. The right to development
is a collective right. Development activists usually try to reduce both poverty
and inequality. There’s been an enormous reduction in world poverty over the
last 25 years, even as inequality has been growing in most countries. This
means it’s easier to fulfill what is known as economic human rights, such as rights
to health, education, and housing. Very little of this change results from
foreign aid; most is a result of the spread of market economies.
Many people in many
countries have benefited from globalization, though others, such as industrial
workers in Canada and the US, have lost their jobs. This is one of the reasons
for the spread of anti-immigrant, anti-foreigner sentiments in the Western
world. Unless we can figure out a way to control these sentiments and reduce the
need for people to flee their own countries because of war, crime, and climate
change, we are facing an uneasy human rights future.
No comments:
Post a Comment