Book Note: Condoleezza Rice’s Extraordinary,
Ordinary People
People who read this blog will know that I don’t
generally like U.S. Republicans, nor do I like people who support the American
gun lobby. Nevertheless, I have just finished reading Condoleezza Rice’s 2010
memoir, Extraordinary, Ordinary People. A cumbersome title, referring to her parents,
whom she adored. I wanted to read this memoir because Rice was the first black
woman ever to be a presidential National Security Advisor, and then to be
Secretary of State (the equivalent of a Foreign Minister) under George W. Bush.
Condoleezza Rice was born in 1954 in Birmingham,
Alabama, where she grew up. Birmingham, she tells us, was the most segregated city
in the US South. Her parents were
educated professionals, her father a Presbyterian minister and her mother a teacher.
At one point in her early childhood they tried to register to vote. At that time, it was still permitted to
“test” voters (usually black) to see if they were fit to vote; the Voting Rights
Act was still to come in 1965. Her mother was light-skinned and the registrar
gave her an easy “test”: who was the first American President. But there was a
jar of beans on the registrar’s desk, and her darker-skinned father was asked
how many beans were in the jar. Obviously, he couldn’t answer correctly, so he
was denied the vote.
At the time, however, Alabama was dominated by segregationist
Southern Democrats. Republicans were
trying to get more votes, and an acquaintance told Rice’s father that there was
a Republican registrar who would let blacks register to vote. So her father
went to that registrar, was registered as a voter, and always after than voted Republican.
wiki commons |
But what hit me most in her memoir was her explanation
of why she supports the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, the one that
gives individual citizens the right to bear arms. She takes seriously the right
of citizens to protect themselves against their government.
In 1963, at the height of the US Civil Rights Movement,
Birmingham erupted in violence and fear. Rice remembers hearing bombs explode
in her neighborhood. She remembers the deaths of four African-American girls at
the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church, and attending their funerals. She used to play dolls with one of the girls,
and the others were all known to members of her tight-knit black middle-class community.
In response
to the violence, she remembers when her father sat on the porch the entire long
night, a gun on his lap. The men of her neighborhood organized patrols to
protect the two entrances to their community from the Ku Klux Klan (a powerful
white racist organization formed in 1866 and supported by many powerful whites,
including members of governments). As
she put it, if black men in Birmingham had had to register their guns, “Bull”
Connor, the cruelly segregationist mayor who ran Birmingham, would have known
who had guns and confiscated them.
Rice tells us that she really admired President John
F. Kennedy and his brother Robert, both assassinated, in 1963 and 1968 respectively.
At one point she was a registered Democrat. But became a Soviet specialist
after studying at the University of Denver with the former Czech diplomat Josef
Korbel (father of her predecessor Madeleine Albright, the first woman Secretary
of State). She was disappointed with the Democrat President Jimmy Carter’s lack
of knowledge of Russia, and she particularly disapproved of his decision to
boycott the 1980 Moscow Olympics because of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
in 1979. By contrast, she thought that Ronald Reagan had a better understanding
of the Soviets, so she became a Republican.
Condoleezza Rice had a strong sense of what it means
to be African-American. She was raised on the principle that to get ahead, she
had to be twice as good as any white person. Her parents also discouraged her
from feeling like a victim, instead encouraging her to work very hard to make
the best of the circumstances she was in. She is a supporter of affirmative
action programs but believes they should be implemented by spotting talented
people and giving them mentoring and financial assistance, not by lowering
standards.
So I guess what this tells us is that you shouldn’t
make assumptions about people based on their politics. I never thought I would
encounter a reasonable argument on the right to bear arms, but Condoleezza Rice
has given me something to think about, as has her account of growing up
African-American.
Update:
A friend of mine has complained to me about this blog. He considers Condoleezza
Rice to be a war criminal because, he says, she signed off on the US use of torture
during the G.W.Bush administration. “What’s next,” he asked me, “a favourable
review of a book about Stalin’s childhood?”
I think he has a valid point, although I would have to check the facts
about Rice’s exact role in authorizing torture.
So I want to make clear that if Rice publishes a second memoir about her
role in the Bush II administration, I will be critical of it. It is an interesting question though: should
we be interested in the early lives of public figures and if so, should that
interest only pertain to their later illegal or evil acts?
No comments:
Post a Comment